Kyiv TV tower, March 2022

'To thwart information attacks against Russia'

2 项说法已与记录核对 · 六种语言PDF

Kyiv TV tower, March 2022

'To thwart information attacks against Russia'2 项说法已与记录核对 · 六种语言PDF

Russian Ministry of Defence, announcing strikes on Kyiv's 'retransmitting hubs' · 1 Mar 2022. On 1 March 2022 Russia's Ministry of Defence announced that, 'for the purpose of foiling information attacks against Russia', it would strike 'technological facilities' in Kyiv and told residents living near 'retransmitting hubs' to leave their homes. At about 17:10 that day missiles hit the Kyiv TV tower beside the Babyn Yar memorial site. Five passers-by were killed, among them a television camera operator. One stated aim, the record, and what it concedes.

6页档案 · 六种语言PDF

记录Russia named the target itself. The stated aim was to stop 'information attacks' — broadcasting and communications — not to gain a military advantage on the battlefield.

客观而言Part of a pattern. ITU counts 40 broadcasting stations affected by the war; the Kharkiv TV tower was brought down by a missile on 22 Apr 2024 (Al Jazeera, 22 Apr 2024).

Claim 1 · 俄罗斯国防部 · 2022年3月1日“For the purpose of foiling information attacks against Russia, strikes with high-precision weapons will be carried out against the Security Service of Ukraine's technological facilities and the 72nd main center of psychological and information operations in Kyiv.”Interfax, 1 Mar 2022; TASS, 1 Mar 2022 · 来源 ↗

Self-incriminating: the stated aim is not a lawful ground for attackThe aim Russia gave is to stop information, not to gain a military advantage. The ICTY committee that reviewed NATO's 1999 strike on Serbian state television concluded that disrupting government propaganda is unlikely to offer the 'concrete and direct' military advantage required, and that a strike justified by its propaganda purpose alone 'might well be questioned' (Final Report to the Prosecutor, 2000, para. 76). Additional Protocol I limits attacks to objects whose destruction offers 'a definite military advantage' (art. 52(2)). 承认了： That broadcasting and communications in Kyiv were chosen as targets because of what they transmitted.证据级别：

Claim 2 · 俄罗斯国防部 · 2022年3月1日“We urge Ukrainian citizens who are enlisted by Ukrainian nationalists to stage provocations against Russia, as well as Kyiv residents who live near the retransmitting hubs, to leave their homes.”Interfax, 1 Mar 2022; TASS, 1 Mar 2022 · 来源 ↗

与记录相矛盾At about 17:10 the same day missiles struck the Kyiv TV tower in Shevchenkivskyi district. The State Emergency Service counted 5 killed and 5 injured as of 18:00, all passers-by (LB.ua, 1 Mar 2022); the charge sheet of August 2025 gives 5 killed and 6 injured, all civilians, and damage to the tower's equipment, vehicles and a sports complex (Office of the Prosecutor General). Among the dead was Yevhenii Sakun, a camera operator for the LIVE channel (CPJ, 2 Mar 2022). Television channels went off air for a time (Ministry of Internal Affairs, via NPR). 承认了： That Russia expected people near the target and struck anyway; a general warning does not lift the duty to spare civilians (Additional Protocol I, art. 51(8)).证据级别： B

我们的诉求ITU members: weigh the record of attacks on Ukraine's broadcasting and telecommunications in the Council elections at PP-26 (Doha, Nov 2026) · ITU: keep the damage assessment of Ukraine's broadcasting network current under Resolution 1408 · states: support the prosecution of those who ordered the strike on the Kyiv TV tower.

来源Interfax and TASS, 2022年3月1日 · LB.ua (State Emergency Service), 1 Mar 2022 · NPR, 2022年3月1日 · CPJ, 2022年3月2日 · Office of the Prosecutor General and SSU, Aug 2025 · ITU, Council Resolution 1408 activities · RDNA5, Feb 2026 · ICTY, Final Report to the Prosecutor on the NATO bombing campaign, 2000 · The Art Newspaper (UNESCO), 2022年3月4日 · 半岛电视台, 2024年4月22日

Kyiv TV tower, March 2022 · 'To thwart information attacks against Russia'

PDF · 6页

Kyiv TV tower, March 2022 · 6-page dossier (PDF) p.1 one-page summary · p.2 the occasion, the speakers, what others said and what was left out · p.3–3 the two claims against the record · p.4 the record side by side · p.5 the law, lines to take and Q&A · p.6 sources and method · v0.1 · 2026年10月29日

在互动平台中打开 → ↑ 事实核查

欢迎使用本记录。引用数字时请注明本页所列的来源和日期；在发言、简报和报道中请引用原始机构，而非本网站。数据开放（CC BY 4.0）。

开放数据（CC BY 4.0）订阅更新报告错误方法与更正

栏目: 案例档案 · 历史档案 · 事实核查 · 联合国记录 · 乌克兰境外 · 国际社会的反应 · 谈判进程 · 制裁 · 研究与分析 · 研究台

语言: English · Français · Español · Русский · العربية · 中文

页面生成于 2026-10-29 · CC BY 4.0